Teacher, could you tell me about the martial law that happened in South Korea recently?


Taro: Teacher, could you tell me about the martial law that happened in South Korea recently?

Teacher: Of course, Taro. Recently, the president of South Korea suddenly declared something called "martial law."

Taro: What is martial law?

Teacher: Simply put, it’s a system where, during times of extreme danger, the government uses the military to restrict people’s freedoms. For example, it can ban political activities or crack down on gatherings.

Taro: That sounds scary. Why did they do that?

Teacher: The president claimed it was because the parliament wasn’t functioning properly. But in reality, it seemed like he used it to protect his own position. The military even stormed the parliament and tried to arrest the lawmakers.

Taro: What!? Trying to arrest members of parliament sounds incredibly dangerous.

Teacher: Exactly. If the military had taken control of the parliament, it would have been impossible for them to revoke the martial law. In other words, the president could have ruled the country however he pleased.

Taro: What happened in South Korea then?

Teacher: Fortunately, opposition lawmakers and citizens quickly gathered to protest, and the martial law was lifted just six hours later. But it was a close call—South Korea’s democracy could have been severely damaged.

Taro: That sounds like a really serious situation. Could something like that happen in Japan?

Teacher: Actually, there’s a similar issue being discussed in Japan right now. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party is trying to amend the constitution to include an "emergency declaration."

Taro: Is an emergency declaration similar to martial law in South Korea?

Teacher: There are similarities. For instance, if the prime minister claims there’s a risk of social disorder, they would be able to use special powers to govern the country. They could issue orders with the same force as laws or give directions to local governments.

Taro: That sounds convenient, but it’s also a bit worrying.

Teacher: Exactly. While swift responses are necessary in emergencies, these powers can be extremely dangerous if abused. For example, the prime minister could manipulate the system to serve their own interests or take away citizens' freedoms.

Taro: Could something like the military interfering in politics, like in South Korea, happen here as well?

Teacher: It’s possible. That’s why it’s crucial for us citizens to oppose this constitutional amendment by the Liberal Democratic Party. To prevent situations like what happened in South Korea, we must ensure that those in power can’t act arbitrarily, and we need to raise our voices.

Taro: I see. It’s a useful system, but if misused, it could lead to terrible consequences.

Teacher: Exactly, Taro. That’s why we must strongly oppose adding an emergency declaration to the constitution. To protect democracy, it’s essential for each and every citizen to stay informed and raise their voices against it.